Nova
Lead research: fundamentals and chart structure turned into a clear thesis.
Never: promise returns; size the trade; dismiss risk.
Persona roster
Eight named AI trading agents on one multi-agent desk, each there to catch what the others miss. Debate, red-team, risk gate, then your approval.
Pick a seat to start, or meet the whole desk for free.
Lead research: fundamentals and chart structure turned into a clear thesis.
Never: promise returns; size the trade; dismiss risk.
Sentiment, narrative, and short-horizon flow.
Never: treat chatter as fact; amplify FOMO.
Macro & regime: rates, liquidity, geopolitics, risk-on/off.
Never: ignore correlation; trade names in a vacuum.
Options & defined-risk structure: hedges with a known maximum loss.
Never: sell undefined risk without flags; hide Greeks.
Crypto markets & on-chain regime: fast, and skeptical of hype.
Never: treat crypto like equities; ignore custody/liquidity.
Execution planner: turns the debate into an ExecPlan (a plan, not an order).
Never: place live orders; bypass HITL; change risk caps.
Risk gatekeeper: vetoes, sizes down, or passes with conditions.
Never: rubber-stamp consensus; invent yield %.
Skeptic and red-team: breaks the thesis before money moves.
Never: soften dissent to be “team player”; invent fake certainty.
The swarm story
Astra started from one uncomfortable observation: ask a single AI model whether your trade idea is good and it usually finds a way to agree with you. It is polite, fluent, and confident, and that is exactly the problem. A trader does not need a cheerleader. A trader needs a desk.
So the work was split the way a professional desk splits it. Research owns the thesis. Sentiment owns the crowd. Macro owns the regime. Options and crypto each get a specialist, because their risks are different. Execution planning is its own job, so the person who likes the idea is not the one who sizes it. Risk sits apart with the power to say no. And one seat exists only to disagree.
Illustrative example. Not a real trade, customer, or result.
Picture a single assistant asked about a hot small-cap: it summarizes the bullish news and suggests an entry. On the Astra desk the same question gets a thesis from Nova, a crowding warning from Pulse, a liquidity objection from Cassandra, and a size cap from Aegis before any plan reaches you. Same question, far better picture of the risk.
Every agent consumes something specific and produces something specific. Nothing skips a step.
| Agent | Works from | Produces | Hands to |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nova | Fundamentals and chart structure | ThesisBrief with an invalidation level | Cassandra and Quill |
| Pulse | News flow, narrative, and positioning chatter | SentimentCard with crowding flags | Cassandra |
| Atlas | Rates, liquidity, and cross-asset regime | RegimeNote that frames every other brief | All seats |
| Vega | Volatility and options chains | StructurePlan with defined risk and Greeks | Quill and Aegis |
| Orbit | Crypto markets and on-chain regime | CryptoBrief with custody and liquidity notes | Cassandra and Quill |
| Cassandra | Every brief above | RedTeam list of what would make the case wrong | Quill, Aegis, and you |
| Quill | The case that survived the red-team | ExecPlan stamped PLAN NOT ORDER | Aegis |
| Aegis | The ExecPlan and the red-team list | RiskGate verdict: PASS, CONDITIONS, or VETO | You, on the Approval Card |
Illustrative cycle. Not a real trade, customer, or result.
A trader wants crypto exposure after a sharp rally and asks the desk for a plan.
What the trader gets: not a signal, but a plan with every objection attached. They can approve it, edit the size, or reject it and wait.
These rules are the reason a human-in-the-loop desk is safer than an autopilot trading bot.
One model asked for an opinion tends to agree with the person asking. Splitting the work into eight narrow roles, with a mandatory skeptic and a separate risk gate, makes disagreement part of the process instead of an accident.
No. Quill can only write a plan stamped PLAN NOT ORDER, and Aegis can only pass, condition, or veto it. The only role that can act on a plan is you.
Disagreement is recorded, not averaged away. Cassandra’s objections travel with the plan to the Approval Card, and Aegis can veto even when every other seat is in favor.
Start with the seat that matches how you already think: Nova for research, Pulse for sentiment, Atlas for macro, Vega for options, Orbit for crypto, Quill for planning, Aegis for risk, or Cassandra for a skeptic. The whole desk still reviews every plan.
Astra: HITL AI trading personas. Not a broker. No % return claims. You approve every plan. Trading involves risk of loss.